REVIEW & COMPARISON:
The Return of the "Original Bezel" 9937
By:
John B. Holbrook, II
December 11th, 2004
One bazillion. That's precise the number of E-Mails I've received in the last year asking me "do you know where
I can get an Invicta 9937 with the old style bezel?" Before I go on, I
think for any of this to make sense, we'll need a bit of a history lesson.
Back in 2002, while I was moderator of the first-ever Invicta Watch Forum, I
organized an effort to convince Invicta to do upgrade some of the features of
their legendary value watch, the Invicta 8926. Our efforts were
successful, and in December of 2002, Invicta released the Invicta 9937.
You can read my review of the first 9937, as well as more of the history behind
the development of the watch
HERE.
The watch stayed in production for roughly a year, but after a bumpy launch
(thanks to some regulation issues with the movements in the first batch that
shipped from Invicta) the watch was very well received. An ETA 2824
automatic movement equipped watch with a sapphire crystal on top, crystal display
back, and styling cues evocative of the most famous watch in the world, all for
about $350.00. By all accounts, Invicta dealers sold all they had as soon
as they could get them in from Invicta. Then something very odd happened.
Invicta suddenly stopped making the 9937.
I suppose it isn't entire accurate to say they stopped making the 9937.
The longer story is that Invicta radically changed the bezel design in late 2002
of the entire Invicta Pro Diver watch line, which included all of the 89xx and
99xx watches. Here's a picture of the subsequent bezel design on the 9937,
which was called the 9937a:
As you can see, the bezel lost the "coin edge" design which is
common among dive watches like Rolex, and gained a scalloped bezel design more
reminiscent of watches made by Omega. Overnight, and with little
explanation, Invicta changed the design of their best selling line of watches -
the Pro Diver line. And almost overnight prices for used 8926's and 9937's
with the "old style" or "original" bezel escalated as supply simply disappeared.
It was about this time that I, in what turned out to be a fairly inept move on
my part, sold my original issue 9937 to purchase another watch. I reasoned
that "I can always pick up another 9937 later right?" Then came the word
that Invicta wasn't making any more 9937's with the original bezel. D'oh!
Fast forward to the Fall of 2004 - the word began leaking out the Invicta was
going to make a very limited production run of 9937's with the original bezel!
Hurrah! The re-issued, original bezel 9937 arrived at my office on
December 9th, 2004 - almost two years to the day since I received my first 9937.
Now the burning question is, "is the re-issued 9937 as good (or better) than the
original 9937?
The re-issued 9937 (which I'll refer to hereafter as the
9937RI) does have some cosmetic differences from the original 9937 (it wouldn't
be an Invicta without changing something around right?). But I'll begin by
highlighting a few of the important things that haven't changed. Firstly,
the same, wonderful rosewood box with, with the translucent display/dust cover
used with the original 9937 is also used in the 9937RI (check out the
original 9937 review
for pictures and more details on the box). The case, bracelet, (with the
exception of how the bracelet attaches to the case) clasp, and markers are also
unchanged. Here's a side by side picture of the original 9937, and the
9937RI (on the right).

In the photographs above, you'll see that the 9937RI now has
holes in the lugs to accommodate screws which are used to connect the bracelet
to the case. It's cosmetic value is in the eye of the beholder, but it's
functionally inferior to the previous, more simple spring bar design. You
see, while it would appear that two screws hold the end links on the bracelet to
the case, that's not exactly how it really works. It's really one
VERY small screw on one side, with a long tube with a screw head on the other.
The small screw actually screws in to the tube from the other side, and both
screws turn freely inside the lugs. This requires the use of two
screwdrivers used simultaneously to remove the bracelet - that's finger
gymnastics that I don't need. The small screw is also very easy to loose.
So, I don't recommend removing the bracelet, which is a shame. I actually
had two bracelets on my original 9937 - one that I kept "stock" with the
polished center links, and one that I applied an entirely brushed finish which
was more scratch resistant. But I don't think I'll be doing many bracelet
changes on the 9937RI. Now let's have a closer look at the 9937RI's dial
to see some of the changes there:
The dial no longer has the word "Swiss" underneath the logo,
but instead has the words "Swiss Movement" at six o'clock. It's a cosmetic
difference, but also denotes a bit more specific information than did the first
9937. In order to legally carry the label "Swiss Made" (like on my Rolex
or Omega watches) watches must have Swiss made movements, and be assembled in
Switzerland. The label "Swiss Movement" means that only the
movement inside the watch with this label is Swiss. The label of "Swiss"
which Invicta used on the original 9937 was always a point of controversy.
Clearly the ETA 2824 used in the original was a Swiss movement, but was Invicta
suggesting that the rest of the watch was either designed, or assembled, or both
in Switzerland? The point was never clear. Now that the 9937RI
carries the label "Swiss Movement" we know the watch does not qualify for the
label "Swiss Made" so it's safe to say that the 9937 wasn't assembled in
Switzerland. I applaud Invicta for applying industry standard labeling in
this way which is more specific than the original "Swiss" label.
Also visible in the above picture are two changes which appear
to be universal throughout the Pro Diver line - the Invicta logo on the short
end of the second hand, and the use of a larger sized crown. The change to
the second hand is no doubt meant to distinguish the Pro Diver watches, like the
8926 and the 9937, from others with a similar design - for much the same reasons
as the scalloped bezel was used on the 9937a and 8926a. Again, the
cosmetic appeal, or lack thereof of the logo on the second hand is in the eye of
the beholder. I rather like it - it's distinctive, and doesn't detract
from the legibility of the dial. The larger crown size I am however
particularly pleased with.
One of the things I appreciate about the Rolex Submariner and
Sea-Dweller I own are the oversized "Triplock" crowns both of these watches
employ. I think they're size is not only cosmetically appealing, but also
functionally a joy to use. Invicta's new larger crowns on the Pro Divers
is nearly identical in size to a Rolex Triplock crown - here's a picture of the
9937RI crown to crown with my Rolex Sea-Dweller (on the right):
Since the milling tolerances for how the threads are milled in
the factory are no doubt not as high as the tolerances used by more costly
watches, the screw down crowns of Invicta watches have always taken a little
extra effort. The larger crown size now makes unscrewing and re-screwing
the crown an easier experience.
Fortunately, Invicta still uses a crystal display back on the
9937 to view the gold plated ETA 2824 movement inside the case. Invicta
has also applied some really nice rotor decoration which makes the view
experience all the more enjoyable:
In observing the accuracy of my 9937RI, it's running about 8-10
seconds per day fast which is fine for a non-COSC certified, unadjusted
movement. It's likely to settle down a bit after the first 30 days, after
which I can always regulate the watch myself to within COSC specifications (for
my article on how to regulate an ETA 2824 movement, click
HERE).
Many questions remain at this time is, "How many of the
re-issued 9937s did Invicta make, and how long will they be available?"
"Will Invicta still sell the 9937a or is it being phased out to be replaced by
this newest 9937?" While these details are unclear at this time, what is
clear is that fans are rejoicng that the 9937 can once again be purchased with
a coin-edge bezel. But act quickly if you want one - they're here today,
but may be gone tomorrow.
There are some additional points which I'd like to see Invicta
improve upon with the 9937. Firstly, the original issue 9937 had a white
dot bezel marker on the top of the bezel, but they're now using the same green
colored bezel marker we saw on the 8926 from years ago. The green isn't
particularly attractive, and I'd prefer white. Also, while I've seen
reports online that Invicta has begun using a higher output luminous compound on
the hands and markers of their watches, this 9937 RI appears to still use the
same old "Tritnite" compound which is inferior to other compounds such as Super
Luminova. And of course, as I mentioned above, go back to plain old,
simple to use spring bars to hold the bracelet to the lugs. But, minor criticism
notwithstanding, it's darn good to have the original bezel 9937 back.
It remains the same fantastic watch that members of the Invicta Forum asked for
back in 2002. Let's hope it stays that way.
Please note that the Author and this site
are in no way affiliated with or related to The Invicta Watch Company. All
trademarked names, brands, models and designs mentioned herein are the sole
property of The Invicta Watch Company.
*All text and images contained in this web site are the original work of the author,
John B. Holbrook, II and are copyright protected. Use of any of the information
or images without the permission of the author is prohibited.
*This review is being re-printed with permission from the author.
|